日本セルポ Official site

Comparison of Effects Based on Cooling Tower Operating Time [Electromagnetic Water Treatment Device Vol. 8]

Comparison of 12-hour and 24-hour full operation! The algae and slime dirt in the cooling tower were treated with Hydroflow.

We would like to introduce a technical case study of the electromagnetic water treatment device "Hydroflow." There was contamination from algae and slime in the cooling tower, which was treated with Hydroflow. This is the condition of clean water during the 12-hour daytime operation. In comparison, other similar cooling towers operated continuously for 24 hours, so we compared the differences based on operating time. In conclusion, it was found that longer operating times resulted in cleaner and more effective water. 【Case Overview】 ■Issues - Contamination from algae and slime in the cooling tower ■Results - A comparison between 12-hour and 24-hour full operation revealed that longer operating times resulted in cleaner and more effective water. *For more details, please refer to the PDF document or feel free to contact us.

Japan Selpo Co., Ltd. Homepage

basic information

For more details, please refer to the PDF document or feel free to contact us.

Price range

Delivery Time

Applications/Examples of results

For more details, please refer to the PDF document or feel free to contact us.

Hydroflow Electromagnetic Water Treatment Device Catalog

PRODUCT

Hydroflow electromagnetic water treatment device

PRODUCT

Comparison of Effects Based on Cooling Tower Operating Time [Electromagnetic Water Treatment Device Vol. 8]

TECHNICAL

Recommended products

Distributors

Sales through a unique nationwide agency network ≪Polar Magnetic Water Treatment Device≫ ≪Hydroflow Electromagnetic Water Treatment Device≫