Comparison of Effects Based on Cooling Tower Operating Time [Electromagnetic Water Treatment Device Vol. 8]
![Cooling Water System - Case Studies [Hydroflow Electromagnetic Water Treatment Device]](https://image.mono.ipros.com/public/premium/image_category/3c6/274845/IPROS26936963897914572334.jpeg?w=140&h=140){kind=small}
![Drinking Water System - Case Study Collection [Hydroflow Electromagnetic Water Treatment Device]](https://image.mono.ipros.com/public/premium/image_category/3c6/274845/IPROS69439629199850155614.jpeg?w=140&h=140){kind=small}
![Other - Case Studies [Hydroflow Electromagnetic Water Treatment Device]](https://image.mono.ipros.com/public/premium/image_category/3c6/274845/IPROS03998511185717645450.jpeg?w=140&h=140){kind=small}
![Cold and Warm Water System - Case Studies [Polar Magnetic Water Treatment Device]](https://image.mono.ipros.com/public/premium/image_category/3c6/274845/IPROS72557335854280627155.png?w=140&h=140){kind=small}
![Cooling Water System - Case Studies [Polar Magnetic Water Treatment Device]](https://image.mono.ipros.com/public/premium/image_category/3c6/274845/IPROS79251995272010270275.png?w=140&h=140){kind=small}
![Drinking Water System - Case Studies [Polar Magnetic Water Treatment Device]](https://image.mono.ipros.com/public/premium/image_category/3c6/274845/IPROS69735160565516462802.png?w=140&h=140){kind=small}
![He/Overseas - Case Studies [Polar Magnetic Water Treatment Device]](https://image.mono.ipros.com/public/premium/image_category/3c6/274845/IPROS86328801913093841016.png?w=140&h=140){kind=small}
Comparison of 12-hour and 24-hour full operation! The algae and slime dirt in the cooling tower were treated with Hydroflow.
We would like to introduce a technical case study of the electromagnetic water treatment device "Hydroflow." There was contamination from algae and slime in the cooling tower, which was treated with Hydroflow. This is the condition of clean water during the 12-hour daytime operation. In comparison, other similar cooling towers operated continuously for 24 hours, so we compared the differences based on operating time. In conclusion, it was found that longer operating times resulted in cleaner and more effective water. 【Case Overview】 ■Issues - Contamination from algae and slime in the cooling tower ■Results - A comparison between 12-hour and 24-hour full operation revealed that longer operating times resulted in cleaner and more effective water. *For more details, please refer to the PDF document or feel free to contact us.
basic information
For more details, please refer to the PDF document or feel free to contact us.
Price range
Delivery Time
Applications/Examples of results
For more details, please refer to the PDF document or feel free to contact us.
catalog（3）
Download All Catalogs
Recommended products
Distributors
Sales through a unique nationwide agency network ≪Polar Magnetic Water Treatment Device≫ ≪Hydroflow Electromagnetic Water Treatment Device≫