インタコンポ 東京本社、大阪支店、長野支店、横浜事業所 Official site

  • CATALOG

Published a technical column "How to Choose a Camera-less Monitoring System" | Quick reference for 3 methods / Suitability by location / Choosing based on scenarios / 5 selection criteria to check.

インタコンポ

インタコンポ 東京本社、大阪支店、長野支店、横浜事業所

We have published a technical column titled "How to Choose Camera-less Monitoring" (A4, 4 pages, with illustrations). When considering monitoring devices, the discussion often revolves around "whether to use a camera or not," but what truly matters is the perspective of what you want to notice in that location. This document organizes the differences between three methods: camera, millimeter-wave radar, and mat/load-based systems, and summarizes how to choose based on suitability for different locations. [Contents] - There are three main types of monitoring methods (Camera / Millimeter-wave radar / Mat/load-based) - Quick reference table of differences between methods (What can be detected / Installation and environment / Usability / Privacy) - Choosing based on scenarios (Falls at night / Toilet and changing room / Confirming presence in living spaces, etc.) - Three common decision points that can cause confusion on-site, and three frequent mistakes - Five items to check during selection This document organizes the general trends for each method. Since the actual feasibility and specifications vary by product, if you let us know the location and what you want to notice, we can assist you with choosing the right option.

Related catalog

How to Choose a Camera-less Monitoring System | Quick Reference for 3 Methods and Suitability by Location, 5 Selection Checkpoints

TECHNICAL

Motioncatch_A4 Front and Back SE

PRODUCT

Monitoring Sensor Comparison Table_Rev001 SE

TECHNICAL