Analysis service for causes of drop in AI search for pharmaceuticals.
"Safety" and "evidence" do not reach AI. A technical assessment for pharmaceutical-related sites to be correctly cited in AI searches.
The proliferation of generative AI and AI search has dramatically changed the information-gathering processes for researchers and procurement professionals. However, in the pharmaceutical and life sciences sectors, there is a risk of being overlooked as candidates for comparison or having strengths misunderstood due to a "structure in which AI cannot accurately interpret specialized information," despite possessing advanced technologies, clinical trial data, and quality control systems. This service analyzes your website based on the logic of "AI evaluating the reliability of information (E-E-A-T) and generating expert responses." It visualizes where information gaps occur and why they do not lead to nominations or inquiries, prioritized for improvement. ▼ Are you facing these issues? - When searching for "specific compounds or formulation technologies," competitors are recommended first. - High-level evidence is buried within PDFs and is not cited or summarized by AI. - AI responses remain at a general explanatory level, failing to convey your unique advantages. - You want to ensure AI recognizes your information correctly while maintaining compliance with regulations like the Pharmaceutical and Medical Device Act. Why not achieve both "accuracy and accessibility of information"? If you share your current URL, we can quickly organize the points where your website is "losing out in AI search" and guide you on how to proceed with the diagnosis.
basic information
【Features】 - AI search/GEO perspective issue summary (one-page conclusion) - Cause map (where there are defects in structure, flow, appeal, and information design) - Improvement priority list (Impact × effort matrix) - Improvement instructions by major page (e.g., Top / Products / Case Studies / FAQ / Document Downloads) - Immediate actionable items (Quick Wins) and mid-term redesign proposals (To-Be outline) 【Our Strengths】 Minimizing both risks and costs. - Creating a "correct" website that delivers long-term results –
Price information
200,000 yen to 600,000 yen (depending on scale and number of pages) * A simple diagnosis (light version) is also possible first / estimates are also acceptable.
Delivery Time
Applications/Examples of results
- Manufacturing industry (BtoB) corporate site / product site / service site - Understanding the current situation before renewal, identifying the causes of decreased inquiries, and creating a starting point for GEO measures
catalog（20）
Download All Catalogs
Recommended products
Distributors
A site that is just cheap ultimately increases costs and risks." We propose web development that maximizes business results while thoroughly addressing essential requirements. Are you creating a website like this? - It seems that the websites of competitors look better, but you don't know why. - Every update incurs additional costs, and before you know it, expenses have ballooned beyond expectations. - While the appearance is nice, it ignores laws and industry-specific rules, leading to complaint risks... - You want to attract customers and inquiries, but the production company only talks about design. - As a result of choosing a production that is simply cheap, you are overwhelmed with trouble handling and can't focus on your core business. Point 1. Avoid troubles with a design that has no "gaps or omissions." 2. Minimize operational costs with a design that assumes in-house updates. 3. Planning power that pursues business results. "Is the initial cost a bit high?" But in the long run, it's safe and cost-effective. We have prepared a plan to truly deliver results "correctly.